
Well... it looked like his head at first glance. Anatomy & Physiology Classes for all, methinks.
As us Manchester United reflect on the fact that the worst possible scenario over the weekend has come to fruition, it all has an air of inevitability about it to me, especially after Chelsea were again the beneficiaries of the doubt when it came to the big decisions in their match against Tottenham.
However, this is not about Chelsea. We knew full well that we had to concentrate on our own task and win our own games and, if we did that, then it wouldn’t matter one jot if Chelsea were awarded a goal every time the ball came within a yard of their opponent’s net or not.
But, like the away match against Chelsea a couple of months ago and the away match against Liverpool a few days later, we failed to deliver in a Premier League away match against a big rival when it mattered most and we must now hope that we can make amends when our chance comes at Old Trafford next weekend. It would certainly be the worst possible time to lose our first home game of the season but as this weekend has shown, nothing can be discounted or taken for granted against Chelsea.
As for yesterday’s game… well… I was quite happy when I saw the positive starting line-up which was a sort of 4-4-2 with Rooney helping out in midfield but as the first half progressed, I became more and more bemused by the role Anderson was playing.
Arsenal were all over us for huge portions of the first half and we couldn’t even get the ball for long periods of play and it looked very much like were were playing with ten men and I put that down to Anderson who was neither here nor there as far as I could see.
He played one or two very good passes when he did eventually get the ball but apart from that, I could not see any point to him whatsoever. He seemed to be getting himself into acres of space which is all well and good when we have the ball but he seemed to be doing it when Arsenal had the ball (which was most of the time) too which left me wondering – who, exactly, does he expect to win the ball back from Arsenal?
Carrick often plays in this way but the difference between Anderson and Carrick is the fact that Carrick does it well. It is something which is often overlooked by Carrick’s critics but, if you watch Carrick closely, you will notice that he is always looking to get into a position that prevents a ball forward by the opposition. Anderson wasn’t doing this and just seemed to be standing as far away from play as possible which meant that Arsenal had free passage through the midfield.
I am aware that I am being extremely unkind to single him out here because other midfielders like Park (who fell asleep in the build-up to Arsenal’s goal), Nani and eventually, Valencia, didn’t have their most effective days either and because of this under-performing midfield, Rooney was drawn further and further back which all combined to ensure that Hernandez had one of his quietest games since joining us. There was simply very little support for him and virtually no service and on the occasions when he did seem to get into a good position, he found himself offside.
And then there’s the penalty decisions.
The first went against Arsenal as Vidic seemed to handle a cross destined for Van Persie’s head. All I can say about this one is that every tv commentator I have heard initially believed Vidic had headed the ball when the incident was viewed in real-time and myself and the people I was watching the game with were all initially congratulating Vidic on a great piece of defending. It was only when Van Persie ran away screaming at the linesman that Vidic had used a hand that the replays were brought out which showed that Vidic’s head was nowhere near the ball whilst his hand most certainly was.
It was slightly bizarre, however, because the ball didn’t appear to deviate in its flight which may have suggested that Vidic actually got nothing on the ball but the fact that a corner was awarded to Arsenal clearly shows that all concerned believed that he did.
For all of Vidic’s great points, it is these moments of madness which have many a United supporter shaking their head because it did look like he knew what he was doing with his hand and it could easily have led to a penalty and a red-card for Vidic which would have ensured that he would play no further part for the rest of the Premier League campaign. Crazy.
However, there were three other penalty appeals (two of which were ignored completely on Match of the Day last night).
The first was when an Arsenal player appeared to grip Evra’s arm between his chest and his own arm and tugged him to the ground. To be honest, I am sure that Evra possesses the physical strength to extricate himself from what would have hardly been a vice-like grip and did appear to be looking for it. It would have been a soft penalty.
The second was when Aaron Ramsey clearly handled the ball. The referee blew for a free kick and indicated a spot some two yards or so outside the area but it was nowhere near that far out. Ramsey started inside the box and jumped forward as he handled and so his finishing position was some distance from his starting position. TV replays showed that the contact was actually made when the ball was on the line – which is a penalty. Again, the benefit of the doubt should probably be given to the officials who are not blessed with stop-motion vision but it was another case of how tiny margins can have enormous consequences.
The third was a stonewall penalty though and I cannot believe that the referee didn’t see this one. There is absolutely no excuse.
A delightful ball played forward from Rooney should have seen the deadly Michael Owen through one on one with the keeper but Owen, who has made a career on opportunities such as those, fell to the ground and replays showed that Clichy clearly took Owen’s leg out from behind and there was nothing subtle about it.
This was the one incident that Match of the Day did show and, predictably, claimed that it evened things up after Vidic’s “handball” earlier in the game. Indeed, Sky Sports commentator and ex-Arsenal player Alan Smith seemed to claim after every United penalty appeal that they evened things up as each one went by! Perhaps we would have been awarded a point had we won the game 3-1 had he been in charge of proceedings?
All things considered though, I think Arsenal probably deserved their win. We simply did not perform well enough to merit a win whilst Arsenal played at least as well as us during our good patches and better than us during their good spells.
What is slightly concerning at this stage is how difficult we seem to be finding it to score from open play. We actually had more shots than Arsenal in this game and twice as many of ours were on target but Szczesny was rarely troubled, in all honesty.
Having said that for all Arsenal’s pretty passing and superior possession, Edwin was rarely troubled either except for, obviously, the goal.
What is worrying about this is that the title race has now come down to a basic shoot-out between ourselves and Chelsea and should the unthinkable happen next weekend and Chelsea take the three points, they will go ahead on goal difference and I wouldn’t back us to outscore them to take the title at this stage.
The good news is that we have enjoyed two very good wins over Chelsea in the Champions League recently and we are more than capable of delivering a third at Old Trafford next Sunday.
At this stage, I would rather be three points ahead with Chelsea to play at OT than three points behind with Chelsea to play at Stamford Bridge. We’re making life typically difficult for ourselves though and I just hope that next week the officials don’t make it any harder.