It’s taken me a few days to get around to writing this review for obvious reasons because I do always like to watch at least one replay of the matches before writing the reviews but I wasn’t in such a great rush to watch this one over again.
However, I watched the match over and it wasn’t actually the painful experience I’d expected. For the opening 10-20 minutes, it was all Manchester United and we had City penned into their own half for much of it with something in the region of 70% possession.
When Ballotelli put City ahead after 22 minutes it was a complete stunner because, up until that point, they’d hardly had the ball.
It must be said though that whilst we had a lot of the ball, we didn’t do an awful lot with it. City were very organised defensively and throughout the match, Joe Hart had very little to do – and this was our main problem in the first half.
However, 1-0 down at half-time was gutting but there was absolutely nothing to suggest the massacre that was to follow and I think most United fans, whilst knowing that the next goal would be crucial, had confidence that we could turn things round.
Whatever Fergie said to the players at half-time was obviously brief and to the point as the players were back out on the pitch and ready to go several minutes before the second half was ready to commence.
But within about a minute of the restart, Evans made a mistake against Ballotelli and tugged at his arm in an attempt to salvage the situation, the referee copped him and had no choice but to send him off for preventing a clear goalscoring opportunity. Whatever plans Fergie had put in place for the second half were destroyed right there in one moment of madness. It was always going to be a uphill task in the second half but that just made it almost impossible.
It has to be said though that for ten minutes or so, we continued to give as good as we got and had Ashley Young not fluffed a great opportunity when he received the ball in the box and scored then we still might have seen a different outcome here because that could have made it 1-1 and perhaps at that stage we could have played a much more defensive game and settled for the point.
It did sort of show that we still weren’t out of the game though and the players tried to do the only thing they knew they could do and get that goal back as soon as possible. This obviously meant that we were vulnerable at the back and with a man short, City were able to exploit the wide open spaces and this ultimately led to our downfall as City have such great passers of the ball that they were able to do so quite easily.
It does show the fine margins between success and enormous failure at this level though. We needed that little bit of luck or that little bit of magic to make it 1-1 but instead we got hit by a sucker punch as Ballotelli got his second on the hour mark to make it 2-0.
At this stage, the game was pretty much up but with half an hour to go there was still plenty of football to be played and so the United players once again tried to do what comes naturally and attack. Ten minutes later, Aguero got City’s third and then it really was game over.
In hindsight, what the players did next was either the craziest of the most courageous thing ever seen but they kept ploughing forward leaving enormous holes at the back but they wanted the goal, they still believed that they could pull this off and when Fletcher curled in a beauty (the best goal of the game, to be honest – unfortunately quantity, not quality always counts in this game) to make it 3-1 with at least ten minutes still to play.
In hindsight, this was perhaps the worst thing that could have happened because it suddenly seemed to make the players think, “Hang on, if can grab one more in the next few minutes then City’s heads might be all over the place for the last few minutes – we can still do this!” and so they went for it.
We had a couple of corners in the next few minutes which City defended well but it did show that again, with a decent delivery and a bit of luck, there was still a goal to be had for us and the players just went for it with everything they had. All the defenders were coming forward and players like Welbeck ended up chasing back doing the jobs of players like Evra! It was just kami-kaze football.
However, I feel that I must take issue with something Fergie said after the match about this stage of the game as he seemed to be suggesting that when it was 3-1/4-1, we should have just accepted that and just defended in order to avoid what ended up a rout.
I can possibly understand it once it went to 4-1 but at 3-1, there definitely was a whiff of a comeback – it was a faint scent; mere tendrils on the horizon but it was there and I, for one, want to see my United team never accept defeat when we need two goals in ten minutes although I will accept that with hindsight, once City went 4-1 ahead, the chance had gone and with just injury time to be played, we should have just kept the ball and played down the clock.
Instead, we continued to try to fight, like a boxer who has been knocked to the canvas four times in a round but keeps getting up on wobbly legs, swinging away feebly only to walk onto yet another right hook.
So, yes, this could and probably should have ended in a 4-1 defeat and not 6-1 but, the record books aside, does it really matter? Fergie made a point about the damage this result did to our goal difference column (ten goals in one match is a devastating blow) but, at this stage, the five points behind is the crucial part. I do tend to agree though that the players should have shut up shop at 4-1 and they probably should have known that.
However, I can also understand how the players would perhaps not know what to do. Do they make the decision to do that, at Old Trafford, against our fierce local rivals by themselves? Why wasn’t Fergie or at least Phelan down on the touchline at this stage, just telling them, “It’s ok lads. Give this one up. Just don’t let them make this completely embarrassing now”? At least the players would have known that they had the manager’s blessing to give up the ghost.
I dunno. I just thought it strange that whilst Mancini was always making his way down to the touchline at various stages to bark out a few instructions, our own management team stayed in their seats throughout. Fergie just seemed a bit too eager to shift the blame onto the players but I think that in hindsight, he must see that he shares some responsibility for the end result.
Anyway, the day definitely belonged to City but I would reiterate that it wasn’t the one-sided massacre that the end scoreline suggests. The first half was definitely an even contest but City always just looked that bit more in control. Defensively they were solid and organised and they contained us to the point where we were restricted to half chances at best. They also worked extremely hard down the wings to nullify Young and Nani and little David Silva was awesome. Their strikers were obviously on the money too.
For us, our defence looked extremely creaky as it has done for much of the season and I still cannot understand why Evans started ahead of Vidic and I can only think that Fergie felt that Vidic was still short of match-fitness. This is probably a moot point though because I have no doubt that Vidic would have pulled on someone’s arm at some stage and got himself sent off just as Evans did!
I said in a recent post that I think Fergie has to come to some sort of decision with the defence and soon because all this swapping and changing is not doing anyone any favours. Ferdinand still brings a lot to the table but he clearly cannot do it in every game these days which means that Fergie has to make at least one change every other game or so but he will know as well as anybody that our success down the years has been built on a stable defensive unit that pretty much play together week in and week out where changes are enforced due to injuries and suspensions – not merely to “keep players happy/match fit” etc.